People v. Virges
This text of 118 A.D.3d 1445 (People v. Virges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered July 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of marihuana in the fifth degree (§ 221.10 [2]). County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from his person and vehicle. The police officer had an “objective, credible reason” for approaching defendant’s parked vehicle and requesting information based on a tip provided by an anonymous informant, who reported that a man was sitting in a gray car smoking marihuana at a certain address (People v Ocasio, 85 NY2d 982, 985 [1995]; see People v Boler, 106 AD3d 1119, 1121 [2013]). Defendant’s vehicle matched that description and was parked at that address. When the police officer smelled marihuana, he had probable cause to search defendant and the vehicle for contraband (see People v Robinson, 103 AD3d 421, 421-422 [2013], lv denied 20 NY3d 1103 [2013]; People v Contant, 90 AD3d 779, 780 [2011], lv [1446]*1446denied 18 NY3d 956 [2012]; People v Black, 59 AD3d 1050, 1051 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 851 [2009]; see generally Arizona v Gant, 556 US 332, 351 [2009]; People v Blasich, 73 NY2d 673, 678 [1989]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 A.D.3d 1445, 987 N.Y.S.2d 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-virges-nyappdiv-2014.