People v. Villanueva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Villanueva

13 A.D.3d 431, 785 N.Y.S.2d 712, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15230

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Villanueva, 13 A.D.3d 431, 785 N.Y.S.2d 712, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated August 16, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal, the Supreme Court’s determination that he was a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]). Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated August 16, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal, the Supreme Court’s determination that he was a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]). Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 431, 785 N.Y.S.2d 712, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-villanueva-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack