People v. Villanueva
This text of 289 A.D.2d 425 (People v. Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered April 7, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, his claim regarding the testimony of one witness stems from questions posed by his own attorney. The defense counsel did not object to or seek to strike any of the challenged responses. The specific objection the defendant now raises with respect to the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371), which favorably addressed the defendant’s concerns regarding impeachment, was not raised before the Supreme Court, and is therefore unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Townley, 245 AD2d 322). Altman, J. P., S. Miller, Crane and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 A.D.2d 425, 734 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-villanueva-nyappdiv-2001.