People v. Vignera

220 N.E.2d 806, 18 N.Y.2d 723, 274 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1153
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vignera. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.2d 970
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1966·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States granted. Return of remit-titur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, at which trial all evidence of defendant’s confession shall be excluded (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 493-494 [revg. 15 N Y 2d 970, 16 N Y 2d 614]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vignera, 220 N.E.2d 806, 18 N.Y.2d 723, 274 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1153 (N.Y. 1966).

220 N.E.2d 806 (People v. Vignera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)