People v. Vignera

209 N.E.2d 110, 16 N.Y.2d 614, 261 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vignera. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.2d 970
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1965·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the United States Constitution, viz.: (1) Whether, in the circumstances of this case, the admission in evidence of a confession elicited prior to arraignment by an Assistant District Attorney from defendant-appellant and recorded by a stenographer constituted a denial of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and (2) whether, in the circumstances of this case, the admission in evidence of police testimony as to statements elicited from defendant-appellant constituted a denial of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that no rights of defendant-appellant under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had been violated. [See 15 N Y 2d 970.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vignera, 209 N.E.2d 110, 16 N.Y.2d 614, 261 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1396 (N.Y. 1965).

209 N.E.2d 110 (People v. Vignera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.