People v. Verdile

69 A.D.3d 661, 891 N.Y.2d 282
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 A.D.3d 661 (People v. Verdile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Verdile, 69 A.D.3d 661, 891 N.Y.2d 282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not limited to, whether the defendant’s plea allocution was sufficient (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]). Rivera, J.P, Miller, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Barrett
98 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Stone
82 A.D.3d 1272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 661, 891 N.Y.2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-verdile-nyappdiv-2010.