People v. Stone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stone

82 A.D.3d 1272, 919 N.Y.2d 864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1272 (People v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stone, 82 A.D.3d 1272, 919 N.Y.2d 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[1273]*1273Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not limited to, whether the defendant’s plea allocution was sufficient (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]; People v Verdile, 69 AD3d 661 [2010]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]). Rivera, J.P, Florio, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1273]*1273Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not limited to, whether the defendant’s plea allocution was sufficient (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]; People v Verdile, 69 AD3d 661 [2010]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]). Rivera, J.P, Florio, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.3d 1272, 919 N.Y.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stone-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack