People v. Velasquez

237 A.D.2d 636, 655 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2984
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Velasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 A.D.2d 510

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered January 9, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[637]*637Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The issue of legal sufficiency has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velasquez, 237 A.D.2d 636, 655 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 636 (People v. Velasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)