People v. Velasquez

213 A.D.2d 1077, 625 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Velasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 198 A.D.2d 25

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea to assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10) because the factual recitation during the plea allocution negated the necessary element of intent by raising the issue of self-defense. That contention is unpreserved (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, it lacks merit (see, People v Lopez, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. —Assault, 1st Degree.) Present—Fallon, J. P., Wesley, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velasquez, 213 A.D.2d 1077, 625 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 1077 (People v. Velasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)