People v. Velasquez

190 A.D.2d 627, 594 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1668
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Velasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 A.D.2d 825

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Altman, J., at pretrial suppression hearing; Bradley, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 11, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The testimony at the suppression hearing was not "inherently incredible or improbable” (People v Samuels, 68 AD2d 663, 666, affd 50 NY2d 1035, cert denied 449 US 984) or "manifestly erroneous” or "plainly unjustified by the evidence” (People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Findings of credibility by the hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal (People v Samuels, supra). Further, the arrest, supported by probable cause, was not a sham, nor could it be made so because the police also hoped to obtain other informa[628]*628tion from defendant with respect to another crime. (People v Cypriano, 73 AD2d 902.) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velasquez, 190 A.D.2d 627, 594 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 627 (People v. Velasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Samuels
409 N.E.2d 1368 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Garafolo
44 A.D.2d 86 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
People v. Samuels
68 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Cypriano
73 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)