People v. Vasquez

14 A.D.3d 440, 787 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 509
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 A.D.2d 230

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered March 24, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues concerning identification and credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). The victim made a prompt and reliable identification of defendant, which was corroborated by other evidence including an officer’s identification of defendant as the person he had been pursuing. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 14 A.D.3d 440, 787 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

14 A.D.3d 440 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)