People v. Vasquez

291 A.D.2d 465, 737 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1645
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered November 3, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Blackburne, J.), of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress his show-up identification and statements to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly determined that there was probable cause for his arrest, and accordingly, properly denied those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress his show-up identification and statements to law enforcement authorities. The descriptions contained in the radio transmissions to the arresting officer, when considered together with the defendant’s close temporal and geographic proximity to the crime, were sufficient to establish probable cause (see, People v Jackson, 282 AD2d 473; People v Blount, 143 AD2d 924). Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 291 A.D.2d 465, 737 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 465 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ball
2018 NY Slip Op 3991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Francis
44 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)