People v. Vargas CA4/2

California Court of Appeal·Decided September 10, 2024·No. E083304·Unpublished

Opinion

Filed 9/10/24 P. v. Vargas CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E083304

v. (Super.Ct.No. BPR2301497)

FRANCISCO VARGAS, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Sylwia Luttrell,

Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.). Dismissed.

Reed Webb, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 INTRODUCTION

A trial court found that defendant and appellant Francisco Vargas violated his

parole by using methamphetamine. The court ordered his parole revoked, and defendant

now appeals. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v.

Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).

On July 15, 2024, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no

arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying

postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the

record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures

set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any

argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not

receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More

than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We

consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo,

supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

2 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

FIELDS J.

We concur:

McKINSTER Acting P. J.

CODRINGTON J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vargas CA4/2, (Cal. Ct. App. 2024).

People v. Vargas CA4/2 (People v. Vargas CA4/2) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Delgadillo
521 P.3d 360 (California Supreme Court, 2022)