People v. Van Schoick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Van Schoick

198 A.D.2d 907, 604 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11588

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd [908]*908Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and. Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd [908]*908Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and. Davis, JJ.

People v. Van Schoick, 198 A.D.2d 907, 604 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 907 (People v. Van Schoick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related