Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Van Schoick

People v. Van Schoick

198 A.D.2d 907, 604 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11588
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 907 (People v. Van Schoick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Van Schoick, 198 A.D.2d 907, 604 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd [908]*908Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and. Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thomas
273 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Reeves
266 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Thornton v. State
636 N.E.2d 140 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 A.D.2d 907, 604 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-schoick-nyappdiv-1993.