People v. Van Buren

203 A.D.2d 961, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4986
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant agreed that, as a condition of the plea bargain, he would appear on the scheduled date of sentencing and that, if he did not appear, the court was not bound by its promised sentence. Defendant did not appear for sentencing and was sentenced in absentia to a term of imprisonment different from the term originally promised. We conclude that, because defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal from the sentence. We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judg[962]*962ment of Oswego County Court, McCarthy, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Van Buren, 203 A.D.2d 961, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 961 (People v. Van Buren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Patton
273 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Lagas
245 A.D.2d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Cole
241 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Wynn
239 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)