People v. Patton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Patton

273 A.D.2d 839, 709 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the enhanced sentence imposed by County Court. As part of the plea agreement, defendant agreed that, if he was arrested for any reason before sentencing, the court would not be bound by its sentence commitment. Defendant was arrested before sentencing and was charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. “‘[B]ecause defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal from the sentence’ ” (People v Wynn, 239 AD2d 921, 922, lv denied [840] 90 NY2d 912, quoting People v Van Buren, 203 AD2d 961). In any event, the enhanced sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the enhanced sentence imposed by County Court. As part of the plea agreement, defendant agreed that, if he was arrested for any reason before sentencing, the court would not be bound by its sentence commitment. Defendant was arrested before sentencing and was charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. “‘[B]ecause defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal from the sentence’ ” (People v Wynn, 239 AD2d 921, 922, lv denied [840] 90 NY2d 912, quoting People v Van Buren, 203 AD2d 961). In any event, the enhanced sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

People v. Patton, 273 A.D.2d 839, 709 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

273 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related