People v. Valentino

102 A.D.3d 760, 957 N.Y.S.2d 876

Opinion

Appeal byCounty (Rooney, J.), dated November 4, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his request for a downward departure from a presumptive risk level two designation to a risk level one designation pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C) following a risk assessment hearing. However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request, as the record does not reflect the existence of an appropriate mitigating factor warranting a downward departure (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentino, 102 A.D.3d 760, 957 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 760 (People v. Valentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wyatt
89 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)