People v. Valentin

89 A.D.3d 1542, 932 N.Y.2d 749

This text of 89 A.D.3d 1542 (People v. Valentin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Valentin, 89 A.D.3d 1542, 932 N.Y.2d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Memorandum:

On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant’s sole contention is that County Court erred in failing to determine that he was entitled to a downward departure to a level one risk. Inasmuch as defendant failed to request such a departure before or during the SORA hearing, however, he failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Ratcliff, 53 AD3d 1110 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 708 [2008]). Present— Scudder, P.J., Garni, Lindley, Sconiers and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ratcliff
53 A.D.3d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 1542, 932 N.Y.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-valentin-nyappdiv-2011.