People v. Valentin

76 A.D.2d 914, 907 N.Y.S.2d 674
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Valentin. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 A.D.3d 1373

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), entered on or about October 31, 2008, which, adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptive risk level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]), given the seriousness of the underlying conduct. We have considered and rejected defendant’s argument that he poses a diminished threat of reoffense (see People v Rodriguez, 67 AD3d 596 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 706 [2010]). Concur—Gonzalez, EJ, Andrias, Acosta, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentin, 76 A.D.2d 914, 907 N.Y.S.2d 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

76 A.D.2d 914 (People v. Valentin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Rodriguez
67 A.D.3d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)