People v. Ureña
This text of 84 A.D.3d 982 (People v. Ureña) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed March 26, 2010, pursuant to CPL 440.46, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on June 25, 1997.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of five years, with two years of postrelease supervision (see People v Tutt, 82 AD3d 1273 [2011]; People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115, 119-120 [2007]). Under the circumstances of this case, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Tutt, 82 AD3d 1273 [2011]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85 [1982]). Prudenti, PJ., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.3d 982, 922 N.Y.S.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-urena-nyappdiv-2011.