People v. Tutt
82 A.D.3d 1273, 919 N.Y.2d 859
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of nine years, with three years of postrelease supervision (see People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115, 119-120 [2007]). Under the circumstances of this case, a further reduction of the defendant’s sentence is not warranted (see People v Medina, 81 AD3d 853 [2011]; People v Schreter, 50 AD3d 930 [2008]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tutt, 82 A.D.3d 1273, 919 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 1273 (People v. Tutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Kelly
85 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Feliciano
84 A.D.3d 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Ureña
84 A.D.3d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)