People v. Turpeau

68 A.D.3d 1083, 890 N.Y.2d 334
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s assertion, the proof offered at the hearing showing that he violated probation by failing to report to probation and make his whereabouts known, and that he was convicted of failing to register as a sex offender, provided clear and convincing evidence that he was at an increased risk to re-offend (see Correction Law § 168-o). Accordingly, the County Court properly granted the motion of the People of the State of New York for an upward modification of his risk level designation from a level two to a level three sex offender. Dillon, J.E, Santucci, Florio and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Turpeau, 68 A.D.3d 1083, 890 N.Y.2d 334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1083 (People v. Turpeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
2017 NY Slip Op 5250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Boyd
121 A.D.3d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Faver
113 A.D.3d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Vancura
95 A.D.3d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Wyatt
89 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)