People v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Turner

191 A.D.2d 978, 595 N.Y.S.2d 268

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the eavesdropping application failed to show that normal investigative techniques had been tried without success or that they would be unlikely to succeed if tried (see, CPL 700.15 [4]; People v Campaigni, 151 AD2d 1010, lv denied 74 NY2d 845). Further, there is no basis for defendant’s contention that the eavesdropping application was based partly on the fruits of a previous eavesdropping warrant that had been illegally issued. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the eavesdropping application failed to show that normal investigative techniques had been tried without success or that they would be unlikely to succeed if tried (see, CPL 700.15 [4]; People v Campaigni, 151 AD2d 1010, lv denied 74 NY2d 845). Further, there is no basis for defendant’s contention that the eavesdropping application was based partly on the fruits of a previous eavesdropping warrant that had been illegally issued. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Turner, 191 A.D.2d 978, 595 N.Y.S.2d 268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

191 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related