People v. Torres

2024 NY Slip Op 01203
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 2024
Docket2018-15121
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01203 (People v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Torres, 2024 NY Slip Op 01203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Torres (2024 NY Slip Op 01203)
People v Torres
2024 NY Slip Op 01203
Decided on March 6, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 6, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2018-15121

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Samuel Torres, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 2624/17) Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Whitney Elliott of counsel), for appellant.


Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Ellen C. Abbot of counsel; Hunter Gajewski on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gia L. Morris, J.), rendered December 14, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the imposition of mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted before the enactment of Criminal Procedure Law § 420.35(2-a), which permits the waiver of surcharges and fees for individuals, like the defendant, who were less than 21 years old at the time of the subject crime. This provision applies retroactively to cases, such as this one, that were pending on direct appeal on the effective date of the legislation (see People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638, 641). Given the People's consent, and in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, we modify the judgment by vacating the mandatory surcharges and fees imposed at sentencing (see CPL 420.35[2-a][c]; People v Sevaughn G., 199 AD3d 936, 937).

BARROS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, DOWLING and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Santana v. Pena
2021 NY Slip Op 04486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Fells
2021 NY Slip Op 06370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 01203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-torres-nyappdiv-2024.