People v. Toms

293 A.D.2d 768, 739 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 4, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 768 (People v. Toms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Toms, 293 A.D.2d 768, 739 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered October 26, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and arson in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to four counts of robbery in the first degree and one count of arson in the third degree and was thereafter sentenced to four indeterminate prison terms of 121/2 to 25 years on the robbery counts and an indeterminate [769]*769prison term of 5 to 15 years on the arson count. All sentences were to run concurrently with each other and with a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon defendant in Texas. At the time of sentencing, County Court also ordered defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $3,296.

Where, as here, a plea agreement does not include mention of restitution, a defendant must be given the opportunity to either withdraw his plea or accept the greater sentence of restitution (see, People v Cowan, 168 AD2d 509). The record makes plain that County Court did not advise defendant of his options in this regard, and this matter must therefore be remitted to County Court for that purpose (see, People v Nichols, 276 AD2d 832).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Sara-toga County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brandon
133 A.D.3d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Culcleasure
75 A.D.3d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. McDowell
56 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. McCarthy
56 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Kegel
55 A.D.3d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Snyder
23 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Branch-El
12 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Harrington
3 A.D.3d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Neu
1 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 A.D.2d 768, 739 N.Y.S.2d 652, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-toms-nyappdiv-2002.