People v. Cowan

168 A.D.2d 509
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 10, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 168 A.D.2d 509 (People v. Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cowan, 168 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered August 4, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 2 to 4 years’ imprisonment for attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, to run concurrently to a definite term of one-year imprisonment for attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and imposed restitution in the amount of $4,456.99.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

We find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was factually sufficient (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). However, the plea minutes do not indicate that the defendant agreed to the payment of $4,456.99 in restitution as a condition of the sentence. Although a court is, of course, free to reserve the right to order restitution with or without the defendant’s consent, the guilty plea in this case was negotiated on terms that did not include mention of restitution. Accordingly, at sentencing, the defendant should have been given an opportunity either to withdraw his plea or to accept the greater sentence of restitution in addition to a prison sentence (see, People v Lopez, 135 AD2d 739, 739-740). Since he was not afforded this opportunity, we now remit the matter for that purpose. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Murdock
99 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Kegel
55 A.D.3d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Henderson
44 A.D.3d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Toms
293 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Watson
287 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Flecha
283 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Nichols
276 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Esquivel
261 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Fulton
238 A.D.2d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Cisco
208 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Moore
176 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Worthington
173 A.D.2d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cowan-nyappdiv-1990.