People v. Tolliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tolliver

257 A.D.2d 420, 682 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 204

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 420 (People v. Tolliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tolliver, 257 A.D.2d 420, 682 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered July 17, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, notwithstanding the fact that the jury acquitted defendant on the count, charging criminal sale of a controlled substance. This Court has repeatedly rejected defendants’ argument to the contrary (see, People v Laboy, 254 AD2d 80). Credibility issues were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered July 17, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, notwithstanding the fact that the jury acquitted defendant on the count, charging criminal sale of a controlled substance. This Court has repeatedly rejected defendants’ argument to the contrary (see, People v Laboy, 254 AD2d 80). Credibility issues were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 420, 682 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tolliver-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack