People v. Tolliver

242 A.D.2d 975, 670 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted and order entered July 14, 1995 (217 AD2d 978) vacated. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, whether defendant was present for certain sidebar discussions during voir dire. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of July 14, 1995 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see, People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, rearg denied 70 NY2d 748; People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046). Defendant is directed to file and serve his brief with this Court on or before December 1, 1997, and, if so filed and served, the appeal is to be added to the calendar for the term of Court commencing February 17, 1998. Present—Pine, J. P., Doerr, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tolliver, 242 A.D.2d 975, 670 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 975 (People v. Tolliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tolliver
267 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)