People v. Tisdale

2022 NY Slip Op 04484
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 2022
Docket471 KA 20-01678
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 04484 (People v. Tisdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tisdale, 2022 NY Slip Op 04484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Tisdale (2022 NY Slip Op 04484)
People v Tisdale
2022 NY Slip Op 04484
Decided on July 8, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 8, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

471 KA 20-01678

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MICHAEL A. TISDALE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


KELIANN M. ARGY, ORCHARD PARK, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DONALD G. O'GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Michael M. Mohun, J.), rendered October 29, 2020. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of driving while ability impaired by drugs.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while ability impaired by drugs (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [4]), defendant contends that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered. Initially, as defendant asserts and the People correctly concede, that contention survives defendant's waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Stafford, 195 AD3d 1466, 1466 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 1029 [2021]). However, it is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see generally People v Bush, 38 NY3d 66, 70 [2022]; People v Sheppard, 149 AD3d 1569, 1569 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1133 [2017]; People v Jones, 118 AD3d 1354, 1354 [4th Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 961 [2014]). We decline to exercise our power to review defendant's contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).

Entered: July 8, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stafford
2021 NY Slip Op 03768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Jones
118 A.D.3d 1354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 04484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tisdale-nyappdiv-2022.