People v. Tillman

155 A.D.2d 976, 549 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14860
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree based upon the discovery of a billy club in defendant’s impounded automobile. On appeal, he contends that reversal is required because the People failed to provide Rosario material (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, [977]*977cert denied 368 US 866). This argument is not properly preserved for appellate review and, in the absence of a showing of substantial prejudice to defendant, we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (see, People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940).

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them either unpreserved or, if preserved, lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — criminal possession of weapon, third degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tillman, 155 A.D.2d 976, 549 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 976 (People v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rashid
164 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)