People v. Tillman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tillman

138 A.D.2d 546, 526 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2814

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Tillman. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D.2d 599 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1988·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond [547]*547County (Felig, J.), rendered September 22, 1986, convicting him of violation of probation, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond [547]*547County (Felig, J.), rendered September 22, 1986, convicting him of violation of probation, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

People v. Tillman, 138 A.D.2d 546, 526 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

138 A.D.2d 546 (People v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related