People v. Thompson

67 A.D.3d 826, 887 N.Y.S.2d 868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 A.D.3d 852

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kase, J), rendered June 12, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions of robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Santucci, J.P., Chambers, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 67 A.D.3d 826, 887 N.Y.S.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 826 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Hawkins
900 N.E.2d 946 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)