People v. Thompson

45 A.D.3d 1414, 844 N.Y.S.2d 730
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W Latham, J.), [1415]*1415rendered February 8, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [1]). The contention of defendant that the prosecutor coerced his guilty plea is not preserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, that contention is belied by defendant’s statements during the plea colloquy (see People v Cato, 306 AD2d 914 [2003], lv dismissed 1 NY3d 569 [2003]). Finally, to the extent that the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his plea of guilty (see People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 851 [1999]), we conclude that it lacks merit (see generally People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Gradia, 28 AD3d 1206, 1207 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 756 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 45 A.D.3d 1414, 844 N.Y.S.2d 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 1414 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Washington
49 A.D.3d 1241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)