People v. Thompson

221 A.D.2d 1016, 635 N.Y.S.2d 558, 634 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13542
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports County Court’s determination that defendant violated a condition of the sentencing commitment. Because defendant failed to fulfill a condition of the sentencing commitment, the court was not bound by it and could impose a greater sentence without providing defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Parsons, 210 AD2d 901, lv denied 85 NY2d 941). The enhanced sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.— Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 221 A.D.2d 1016, 635 N.Y.S.2d 558, 634 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 1016 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Melendez
291 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Cato
226 A.D.2d 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)