People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thompson

185 A.D.2d 951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thompson, 185 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appealby the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered July 30, 1991, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (four counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (four counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appealby the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered July 30, 1991, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (four counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (four counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack