People v. Thompson

111 A.D.2d 531, 489 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51585
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 A.D.2d 554

Opinion

Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smyk, J.), rendered June 23, 1980, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In February 1975, defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment with a minimum term of one year and a maximum term of life upon his conviction of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In 1980, defendant applied for resentencing pursuant to Penal Law § 60.09, and this application was granted. Subsequently, defendant was resentenced to a term of imprisonment with a minimum term of one year and a maximum term of 20 years.

Defendant contends that the sentencing court’s failure to afford his counsel an opportunity to address the court necessitates a remittal for resentencing. The District Attorney, with admirable candor, joins in this argument.

After conducting a review of the record, we find that, in the interest of justice, this matter should be remitted to County Court for resentencing (see, CPL 380.50; People v Lucks, 91 AD2d 896).

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted to the County Court of Broome County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 111 A.D.2d 531, 489 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

111 A.D.2d 531 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lucks
91 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)