People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Thompson

88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17291

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Thompson, 88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Felig, J.), imposed January 3, 1980, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 8 Vá years and a maximum of 25 years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 3Vs years and a maximum of 10 years. As so modified, sentence affirmed. Under [940]*940the facts presented, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J. P., Weinstein, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Felig, J.), imposed January 3, 1980, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 8 Vá years and a maximum of 25 years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of 3Vs years and a maximum of 10 years. As so modified, sentence affirmed. Under [940]*940the facts presented, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J. P., Weinstein, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack