People v. Thomason

367 N.W.2d 364, 141 Mich. App. 578
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 1985
DocketDocket 77097
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 367 N.W.2d 364 (People v. Thomason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thomason, 367 N.W.2d 364, 141 Mich. App. 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, on December 23, 1983. Defendant was sentenced to from 84 months to 168 months in prison. Defendant appeals from his sentence to this Court as of right.

[580]*580Defendant was convicted after the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People v Coles, 417 Mich 523; 339 NW2d 440 (1983). His sentence is therefore reviewable by this Court. Coles, supra, p 551.

At sentencing, the trial court used the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines even though their use did not become mandatory until March 1, 1984. See, Administrative Order No 1984-1, 418 Mich xxiv (1984). After some discussion about the proper point total to be used in applying the guidelines, the trial court sentenced defendant. The trial court articulated the reasons for the sentence it was imposing on the record. Defendant now contends that the trial court abused its discretion by assigning the wrong number of points for Offense Variable 2 under the robbery heading. While we can see from the record that there was a difference of opinion between defense counsel and the court about the proper number of points to be assigned, we decline to pass on that question. The only issue before us is the question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in fashioning defendant’s sentence. We note that the trial court stated on the record the reasons for the sentence imposed. We cannot say that under the circumstances of this case the conscience of the reviewing Court is shocked. Defendant’s sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Yarbough
384 N.W.2d 107 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Thomason
367 N.W.2d 364 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 N.W.2d 364, 141 Mich. App. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomason-michctapp-1985.