Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Thomas R.O.

People v. Thomas R.O.

136 A.D.3d 1403, 24 N.Y.S.3d 572
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2016
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 1403 (People v. Thomas R.O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thomas R.O., 136 A.D.3d 1403, 24 N.Y.S.3d 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the conviction is vacated, defendant is adjudicated a youthful offender, and the matter is remitted to Oneida County Court for sentencing.

Same memorandum as in People v Thomas R.O. ([appeal No. 1] 136 AD3d 1400 [2016]).

All concur except Carni and DeJoseph, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm in accordance with the same dissenting memorandum as in People v Thomas R.O. ([appeal No. 1] 136 AD3d 1400 [2016]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thomas R.O.
136 A.D.3d 1400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 A.D.3d 1403, 24 N.Y.S.3d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thomas-ro-nyappdiv-2016.