People v. Thomas

25 A.D.3d 346, 808 N.Y.S.2d 644
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered June 30, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of A1!2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The Feople made a sufficiently particularized showing of an overriding interest justifying closure of the courtroom during the undercover officer’s testimony (see e.g. People v Lopez, 18 AD3d 233 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 807 [2005]). The officer testified that although he was on restricted duty due to an [347]*347injury, he planned, upon his recovery, to resume undercover work in the specific area of defendant’s arrest. He also testified that unapprehended subjects remained at large and that he feared for his safety. Furthermore, the court properly permitted the officer to testify anonymously based on this same showing (see People v Waver, 3 NY3d 748 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 25 A.D.3d 346, 808 N.Y.S.2d 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

25 A.D.3d 346 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Purdie
2019 NY Slip Op 6804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)