People v. Thomas

281 A.D.2d 646, 722 N.Y.S.2d 393, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 468

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), rendered March 8, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the argument was preserved for appellate review, the Supreme Court did not err in denying the defendant’s Batson claim as to two of the People’s peremptory challenges (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; Purkett v Elem, 514 US 765; Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 364-365; People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 281 A.D.2d 646, 722 N.Y.S.2d 393, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Purkett v. Elem
514 U.S. 765 (Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Payne
666 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)