People v. Thomas

254 A.D.2d 230, 679 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 A.D.2d 120

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered May 24, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, 6 to 12 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s unpreserved challenge to the court’s charge to the jury concerning the deliberative process is not exempt from preservation requirements (see, People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467, 471-474) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the charge, when read as a whole (see, People v Coleman, 70 NY2d 817, 819), conveyed the appropriate standards concerning the requirement of a unanimous verdict. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 254 A.D.2d 230, 679 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 230 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Coleman
517 N.E.2d 1319 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Thomas
407 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)