People v. Thomas

280 A.D.2d 998, 720 N.Y.S.2d 668, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the conviction of two counts of felony driving [999]*999while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see generally, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s vehicle was pulled off the road at an intersection and a police officer observed defendant slumped over the wheel of the vehicle; the officer had difficulty awakening defendant and smelled alcohol when defendant rolled down the window of the vehicle; the keys were in the ignition; the officer did not observe any beverage containers in or around the vehicle; defendant was unable to perform field sobriety tests; defendant admitted that he drank 10 or 11 beers at one location and drove to the intersection, intending to drive to another location to play horseshoes; and the results of a breathalyzer test indicated that defendant’s blood alcohol level was .16%. The jury could infer from that evidence that defendant operated his vehicle while intoxicated (see, People v Saplin, 122 AD2d 498, 498-499, lv denied 68 NY2d 817). (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 280 A.D.2d 998, 720 N.Y.S.2d 668, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 998 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thompson
299 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)