People v. Thomas

235 A.D.2d 509, 652 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 96

Opinions

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated October 17, 1994, which, upon renewal, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

We reverse for reasons stated in People v Lopez (235 AD2d 496 [decided herewith]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 235 A.D.2d 509, 652 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 509 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
235 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)