People v. Thomas

207 A.D.2d 1029, 617 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10349
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court erred in permitting the People to cross-examine defendant regarding his uncharged use of cocaine without conducting a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350; People v Holloway, 185 AD2d 646, 647, lv denied 80 NY2d 1027). In light of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt, however, that error was harmless (see, People v Myers, 185 AD2d 695; People v Holloway, supra).

Finally, defendant’s sentence is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.— Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thomas, 207 A.D.2d 1029, 617 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 1029 (People v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Watkins
229 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Furtick
213 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)