People v. Thibodeau

219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D.2d 883 (People v. Thibodeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Thibodeau, 219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: On this application seeking a change of venue, we conclude that defendant has not met her burden of demonstrating that there is “reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Oswego County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may be made at that time. The relief requested in the application seeking a change of venue presently before us is premature (see, People v Scott, 197 AD2d 936; see also, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342). Present — Green, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ. (Filed Aug. 31, 1995.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Chinn
231 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-thibodeau-nyappdiv-1995.