People v. Chinn
This text of 231 A.D.2d 965 (People v. Chinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for a change of venue denied. Memorandum: On this motion for a change of venue, we conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate motion may be made at that time. The relief requested is premature (see, People v Thibodeau, 219 AD2d 883; People v Scott, 197 AD2d 936). Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D.2d 965, 648 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chinn-nyappdiv-1996.