People v. Taylor

277 A.D.2d 260, 715 N.Y.S.2d 655, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11215
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered November 14, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in [261]*261the seventh degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court, imposed March 31, 1998, modifying the sentence imposed upon the convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment and resentence are affirmed.

The defendant’s bare assertion that the prosecutor used a disproportionate number of peremptory challenges to exclude black individuals from the jury was insufficient to make a prima facie showing of discrimination under Batson (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Jenkins, 84 NY2d 1001, 1003; People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266; People v Williams, 253 AD2d 901; People v Gray, 243 AD2d 648). Thompson, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 277 A.D.2d 260, 715 N.Y.S.2d 655, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 260 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. White
282 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)