People v. Taylor

249 A.D.2d 33, 671 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejeda, J.), rendered April 24, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and [34]*34sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s receipt of testimony regarding typical roles played by participants in street-level drug sales, admitted to explain the absence of prerecorded buy money on defendant and the codefendant at the time of their arrest, is the same argument we rejected upon the codefendant’s appeal (People v Taylor, 247 AD2d 277), and we see no reason to reach a different determination here. Likewise, since “[t]he People’s theory that the money was handed off to a third person was grounded in the evidence” (supra, at 278), the People’s summation comments on this subject were not speculative.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 249 A.D.2d 33, 671 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 33 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sample
45 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)