People v. Taylor

210 A.D.2d 358, 620 N.Y.S.2d 276
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 A.D.2d 628

Opinion

—Appeal by the [359]*359defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered September 15, 1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Micheline, 154 AD2d 624), and, in any event, it is without merit (Matter of Mark T., 168 AD2d 218). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 210 A.D.2d 358, 620 N.Y.S.2d 276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 358 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Micheline
154 A.D.2d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re Mark T.
168 A.D.2d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)